<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Realism vs Idealism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeGint</title>
		<link>http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeGint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, those were mostly old people!  Alexander Hamilton and Tommy Jeff aside, most of the &quot;revolutionaries&quot; were learned older men with &quot;cooler heads&quot; (contrast the bloody French Revolution&#039;s Jacobins with our Republicans) who synthesized the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Adam Smith and Burke to synthesize a rights based natural law oriented constitutional republic.  They did not take from a singular ideology like most utopians and fascistic movements tended to.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Abolitionists were guided by the Bible -- they were for the most part evangelical Christians with a relatively well tested philosophy to guide their actions.   Woman&#039;s suffrage was a multi-generational transformation, not a sudden change, and it used persuasion (like the non-violent civil rights movement) over coercian.   Maybe patience is the key to peace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, those were mostly old people!  Alexander Hamilton and Tommy Jeff aside, most of the &#8220;revolutionaries&#8221; were learned older men with &#8220;cooler heads&#8221; (contrast the bloody French Revolution&#39;s Jacobins with our Republicans) who synthesized the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Adam Smith and Burke to synthesize a rights based natural law oriented constitutional republic.  They did not take from a singular ideology like most utopians and fascistic movements tended to.   </p>
<p>The Abolitionists were guided by the Bible &#8212; they were for the most part evangelical Christians with a relatively well tested philosophy to guide their actions.   Woman&#39;s suffrage was a multi-generational transformation, not a sudden change, and it used persuasion (like the non-violent civil rights movement) over coercian.   Maybe patience is the key to peace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landonswan</title>
		<link>http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>landonswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>You forgot Hitler. All good points. In the same boat however are the many people who are responsible for Women suffrage, black rights, and our country&#039;s independence. I guess it works both ways. I def agree that not all new bold ideas are good ones--Obama policies serve as good evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot Hitler. All good points. In the same boat however are the many people who are responsible for Women suffrage, black rights, and our country&#39;s independence. I guess it works both ways. I def agree that not all new bold ideas are good ones&#8211;Obama policies serve as good evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeGint</title>
		<link>http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeGint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>As for this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Because while experience and realism will always be a smart safe choice, its always the young, idealistic and foolishly overenthusiastic idealists that make real and lasting change for the better.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t help but think of the youthful Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Fidel, Che, Hugo, etc, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe if we can keep these youthful idealists in private enterprise, we can accomodate an agreement somewhere....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Because while experience and realism will always be a smart safe choice, its always the young, idealistic and foolishly overenthusiastic idealists that make real and lasting change for the better.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#39;t help but think of the youthful Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Fidel, Che, Hugo, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Maybe if we can keep these youthful idealists in private enterprise, we can accomodate an agreement somewhere&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeGint</title>
		<link>http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeGint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landonswan.com/personal/realism-vs-idealism/#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to advance quickly.  I want to move along incrementally using all the accumulated knowledge of past generations to make (and keep) human life increasingly better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem with advancing too quickly is it leaves your flank exposed to a counter maneuver.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hence, Pelosi, Reid, and the Obama Slammah.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;___________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t want to advance quickly.  I want to move along incrementally using all the accumulated knowledge of past generations to make (and keep) human life increasingly better.</p>
<p>The problem with advancing too quickly is it leaves your flank exposed to a counter maneuver.   </p>
<p>Hence, Pelosi, Reid, and the Obama Slammah.</p>
<p>___________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

