Liberals will have you believe that the top 1% richest of people / companies are evil and deserve to be bled dry on taxes. They’ll mention “Fortune 500 CEOs” and “Exxon Oil” as their ‘evil’ examples.

And sure, for the pessimistic, ‘my life isn’t my fault’, ‘life isn’t fair’, cry-baby economic light-weight libs out there, its very appealing to want to tax the life out of those evil fat-cat corporations.

But here’s what those people don’t understand:

The top 1% drive the economy:

  • Create jobs
  • Invent new products
  • Cure diseases
  • Will find the solution to our dependence on oil
  • Pay 34% of the country’s taxes

Why do they do all these great things for us?

THEY DON’T DO ANY OF IT FOR YOU OR ME. THEY DO IT FOR THEMSELVES.
They do it out of selfish capitalistic motivation to line their pockets with cash! Sounds evil huh? Well I have news for you–THAT IS CAPITALISM and IT WORKS.

The more diseases they cure, the more inventions they make, the more factories they open up and fill with new jobs, the more money they make.

Now here’s the real kicker—The MORE we tax those people/companies, the LESS they contribute in taxes.
Now you’re asking yourself, “I thought this guy was good at math, how can he expect me to believe this?”

Here’s the basics….

When you tax the rich MORE, they have LESS incentive to risk money to make more profits. So their profits are smaller. Even though you are taking a higher percentage of those profits, the size difference in the profits actually makes the taxes smaller. Essentially, you are taking a bigger piece (%-wise) of a much smaller pie, and ending up with less yummy in your tummy.

Want proof that companies’ bottom lines are tied to the tax rate?

Check out this little 40 year chart I threw together (1961-2000), with data from yahoo finance and truthandpolitics.org, which shows the direct relationship between the top marginal tax rate (what % in taxes the richest pay on the next dollar they make) versus the stock market, measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Click on the chart for a large version, easier to read:

Now take a look at a piece done by CNN (libs) showing the Obama plan to tax the rich (despite the obvious negative effects that will have on innovation, jobs and growth). Also, its hilarious to note how bias the reporters are, just listen to the tone as they read the numbers. It is also interesting to note that they left out the 161k – 2.9M section. Perhaps those numbers didn’t favor Obama? Anyway, CNN is amazingly slanted to the left for a national media station, but that’s another blog…

And here is Obama’s tax plan:

  • Kevin Kim
    Personally, I'm a big proponent of a flat tax (or at least a less complicated tax system). The general argument is that the richest 1% should pay the proportionally the same amount in taxes.

    Not sure of the accuracy of these numbers, but given all the write-offs and loop holes available to them, the top 1% earn 20% of the income, but pay 12% of the taxes. I'm advocating that if the top 1% earn 20% of the income in this country, they should pay 20% of the taxes in this country.

    A little simplistic, but can you agree with that?
  • "I'm advocating that if the top 1% earn 20% of the income in this country, they should pay 20% of the taxes in this country."

    I agree....therefore the taxes on the rich should be cut in half, since at present they are paying 40% of the bill.
  • Kevin Kim
    i think we all agree in principle.

    looking at that chart - while the top 1% pay about 40% of total personal taxes collected, there's nothing telling me what percentage of total income that 1% earns. (i've done a quick search and haven't found it yet...).
  • Kevin Kim
    i've done some digging, and based on this:
    http://www.heritage.org/resear...

    the top half are probably paying too much (proportionally), and the bottom half is not paying enough.

    of course, real life is a little more complicated than this :-(
  • landonswan
    I agree that everyone should pay an equal percentage. However, the current system upsets me because the rich pay a far higher % than the poor, which is what you mistakenly believe the opposite of lol.

    Right now the top 1% pay about 40% of all taxes. Your numbers are way off. (http://www.ntu.org/main/page.p....

    Trust me, all the 'write-offs and loopholes' (rhetoric for people who don't understand tax law) don't come close to making up for that fact that when Bill Gates makes another dollar, 35+% goes to uncle sam and when Joe poor guy makes another dollar, 10% goes to uncle sam.

    (http://www.fairmark.com/refren...

    So I agree with your basic philosophy that all should pay the same percentage, I just find it amusing that you thought you were making an argument against the rich, when in fact you were doing the opposite.

    Logic's a bitch ain't it?
  • The target is so big on the rich, and with politics you're obviously casting your net towards the common American. It reminds me why free-market capitalism gets left at the door because it all boils down to basic numbers. What appeals to the masses. So the economic perspective is interesting, but misunderstood by the average voter.

    I am totally in your camp in views of the economy, by the way. I can just see the perspective that misses the forest for the trees.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2010 Landon Swan Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha
<script type="text/javascript"> var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-1600639-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}</script>